On 10/25/07, deckrider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only Continuum uses "<scm><connection></connection></scm>" within > pom.xml? Thus if its no longer valid, everything else would still > work in the case that we needed to rebuild some artifacts from their > original tags?
It gets used when you generate the website [1], but that and Continuum are the only things I know of that care about it. Maybe the scm plugin uses it? > This somehow feels non-modular to me that all my projects that I put > in my SCM should know about the SCM in which they exist (and their > location within that SCM), but perhaps there is some clue that I'm > missing. Well... how often is this really going to be an issue? There should be only one SCM of record, and that's the one that belongs in the pom of projects under active development. [1] http://myfaces.apache.org/api/source-repository.html -- Wendy