Not going to disagree with Joseph at all, just want to add an observation that I’ve been thinking about for awhile.
The practice of claiming authority, properly citing sources, and noting your changes is inherently academic, and arose in the Renaissance period as a response and counter-reaction to the unauthorized distribution and un-cited reuse of scientific research. It ultimately led to the development of modern academic journals. In other circles and from a place of external privilege, this same kind of theft that the academics were upset by would be rebranded as the “folk process” and the claim would be made that there was a total lack of authority and citation. The truth is somewhere in between, of course, but I do believe that the folk process ultimately doesn’t care one way or the other, and that “I learned this dance from my Uncle Brad and the folks in Greenwood” is more than good enough. I also suspect the results are probably better overall when we worry about it less. Neal Schlein Librarian, MSLIS On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 8:49 AM Joseph Erhard-Hudson via Contra Callers < [email protected]> wrote: > As for the first part of your question, callers have been tweaking > sequences for decades now, for all sorts of reasons; to make them work > better, or to suit evolving tastes in what dancers enjoy, or even by > accident. The Callers Box is chock full of the results. I don’t think > anyone is going to suddenly be precious about it in this particular case. > > As for the last part, the issue at hand is to avoid the swing. Modifying > the dance does that just as much as avoiding the dance altogether. Find a > move or moves that leave the shadows in the same relative positions ready > to do the next thing. Congratulations, you’ve composed a new dance/dance > variant! Test it and see if it works well enough to call. If you call it at > an event and/or publish it, politely acknowledge the source. > > > > *Sent from my phone, which has odd ideas about formatting sometimes.* > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:51 AM Alex Burka via Contra Callers < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Here's a secret fourth thing: how do we feel about calling a shadow swing >> dance (if it was otherwise desirable for some reason) but swapping out the >> swing for a do-si-do or something similar? Is that too much modification by >> the caller, or too little to solve the problem? >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024, 10:52 AM Amy Wimmer via Contra Callers < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Exactly this. >>> -Amy >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024, 1:43 AM JJ via Contra Callers < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think there's a bit of privilege being shown in this thread that >>>> needs to be addressed. Those who are admonishing others for avoiding shadow >>>> swings clearly haven't been put in a position where they felt unsafe >>>> swinging with someone they didn't choose, and then being (more or less) >>>> forced to continue to swing with that person throughout an entire dance. >>>> And I'm not just talking about feeling uncomfortable with someone's >>>> personality, sexual harassment, or general bigotry. I'm also talking about >>>> unsafe dance practices like forceful/non-consentual flourishes/dips, >>>> improper weight given, unsafe swinging speeds without paying attention to >>>> the needs of the person you're swinging with, ignoring (and therefore >>>> exacerbating) an existing injury... The list goes on. >>>> >>>> The swing is arguably the move that requires the most trust in the >>>> other person, and not being able to choose someone that you're doing half >>>> the swings in a dance with can cause some unsafe situations for various >>>> reasons. A single swing with a neighbor can usually be accommodated, but >>>> much more than that can become dangerous. >>>> >>>> Also, people are allowed to just not like shadow-swings without giving >>>> a reason or explaining themself. They are allowed to find them >>>> confusing/disorienting. Just as others are allowed to enjoy them. >>>> People are also allowed to avoid dancing with certain people for any >>>> reason whatsoever; yes we want to be inclusive, but inclusivity to the >>>> point of ignoring the safety/comfort of the individual runs into the >>>> Horseshoe Problem (ie. pushing an issue so far that you end up causing the >>>> problems you set out to avoid). >>>> >>>> To bring it back to the topic at hand, I think a good rule of thumb as >>>> a caller (and one I employ on the rare occasion I choose a dance with a >>>> shadow swing) is telling people that the next dance has a shadow swing in >>>> it, in advance of the walkthrough. And then giving people a chance to >>>> choose to sit out or even join a different line if they have concerns. That >>>> way, those that enjoy the move can have a nice time, and those that don't >>>> aren't forced into an unsafe situation until they can get to the end of a >>>> line to drop out. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, 10:39 Maia McCormick via Contra Callers < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Prompted by some recent conversations, I’m curious how folks here feel >>>>> about shadow swings! >>>>> >>>>> 1. As a caller, do you: >>>>> A) not have an issue with shadow swings, and program them freely >>>>> B) not tend to program them just bc they don’t come up in your >>>>> repertoire, but have no issue with them >>>>> C) not program shadow swings as a matter of principle >>>>> D) some secret fourth thing (feel free to elaborate!)? >>>>> >>>>> 2. How do you feel about shadow swings as a dancer? >>>>> >>>>> Will weigh in with my thoughts later, both to avoid biasing the >>>>> conversation from the outset, and also because I’m currently in transit 😅 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for participating in the data gathering! >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Maia >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Maia McCormick (she/her) >>>>> 917.279.8194 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected] >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected] >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>> [email protected] >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ > Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
