Thank you everyone! This was very helpful :)
On 04/02/2025 16:04, Michael Dyck via Contra Callers wrote: > On 2025-02-04 1:14 p.m., Colin Hume via Contra Callers wrote: >> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:19:43 -0500, Michael Dyck via Contra Callers wrote: >>> I don't think waltzing would fit very well in that formation. >>> If two in each threesome are waltzing, that leaves out the third. >> >> You're assuming that a dance in waltz time involves rotating with a ballroom >> hold > > No, I'm not assuming that at all. (I'm quite aware of the distinction.) > The original message didn't say "waltz time", it said "waltzing somehow", > which to me sounds like the dance-form, not the time signature. > > -Michael > _______________________________________________ > Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
