Jozef, Can you also try action #4?
*4. Anil & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will attempt to reproduce locally in order to establish if this is a real blocker. We strongly recommend that the team enable "debug" on some runs while trying to reproduce the bug.* * Deliverable: Comment on bugzilla [2] to confirm if Bug 6658 is a real blocker.* Thanks, Abhijit On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:02 PM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com> wrote: > The CONTROLLER/OPENFLOWPLUGIN team and other folks met to discuss the > status of this bug and the current plan of action is as follows: > > > > 1. TomP & CONTROLLER team will remove the invalid test(s) as per Bug 6659 > [1]. > > Deliverable: Patch(es) removing or fixing the tests. > > 2. The release team will schedule a respin of RC3.2 with the VBD fix at > 9/7 23:59 UTC. > > Deliverable: Boron RC3.2 Common Karaf Disitrbution. > > 3. Luis & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will run OFP tests a few more times. > > Deliverable: Comment on bugzilla [2] to confirm if we only get the > expected 26 failures in subsequent runs. > > 4. Anil & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will attempt to reproduce locally in order > to establish if this is a real blocker. We strongly recommend that the > team enable "debug" on some runs while trying to reproduce the bug. > > Deliverable: Comment on bugzilla [2] to confirm if Bug 6658 is a real > blocker. > > 5. Luis & OPENFLOWPLUGIN team will fix the tests that are failing because > of the change in behavior of candidate lists. > > Deliverable: Patch(es) fixing tests. > > > > Best Regards, > > An Ho > > > > [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6659 > > [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6658 > > > > > > *From:* Colin Dixon [mailto:co...@colindixon.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:35 AM > *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare > *Cc:* An Ho; controller-dev; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; > openflowplugin-dev > *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [controller-dev] Regression in OF > cluster test > > > > We're trying to figure that out, but if we could have somebody with > experience in OpenFlow plugin clustering give their 2 cents on if it's a > bug in the test or the behavior, that would really help. > > Thanks, > > --Colin > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Luis and An. If it is a test needing update rather than the code - > it might be better to keep Tom's fix. > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:23 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com> wrote: > > Still waiting to hear back from the controller team, but in the meantime I > have created the following blocker bug [1] and updated the tracking > spreadsheet. > > > > Hopefully after updating the tests there will not be any issues found. > > > > Best Regards, > > An Ho > > > > [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6658 > > > > *From:* Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 07, 2016 10:07 AM > *To:* An Ho > *Cc:* controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; > Tom Pantelis; Colin Dixon > > > *Subject:* Re: Regression in OF cluster test > > > > So far I can see it mostly impacts entity-owner API behavior, so updating > the test cases will fix most of the failures. I am counting 1 day to update > the test cases and run few times to see if there are other issues. If there > is no issue after updating the test we can be ready by tomorrow, if there > are issues after the test update I really doubt we can address them before > Friday morning. > > > > BR/Luis > > > > > > On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:59 AM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > Adding release mailing list since it may impact RC3 > > > > Hi Tom Pantelis, > > > > Any comments regarding patch 45271. Seems like it is changed the cluster > behavior and that introduced regression in OpenFlowPlugin. Would reverting > be an option? > > > > Hi Luis, > > > > Is the impact confined to only CSIT test cases? Or does it affect end user > regression of functionality as well? In other words, would be sufficient > to update the test cases? Currently patch 45271 is related to blocker bug > 6540 so reverting may be difficult. Hypothetically, if the testing phase > of RC3.2 will stretch to Friday morning, so would that be enough time to > update the test cases and rerun the test? > > > > Best Regards, > > An Ho > > > > [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45271/ > > [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6540 > > > > > > > > *From:* Luis Gomez [mailto:ece...@gmail.com <ece...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 07, 2016 9:49 AM > *To:* controller-dev; openflowplugin-dev; An Ho > *Subject:* Re: Regression in OF cluster test > > > > Most of the test regression seems to be related with entity-owner API > behavior. Repair the test and retest everything is going to cost us one > day, so should we go ahead or we revert the patch? > > > > BR/Luis > > > > > > On Sep 7, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I am not sure this was intended (cluster behavior change) but this patch: > > > > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45271/ > > > > introduced regression in the OpenFlow cluster test: > > > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-3node/ > job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-boron/ > > > > BR/Luis > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > controller-dev mailing list > controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openflowplugin-dev mailing list > openflowplugin-...@lists.opendaylight.org > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > controller-dev mailing list > controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev > >
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
