On 11/29/2016 01:15 PM, Sela, Guy wrote: > Are you trying to argue that there is no real meaning to the “globality” > of Global RPC because theoretically someone could register it in a > number of nodes? > > Isn’t this the same case with RoutedRpc that different nodes can > register for the same path?
Naming pre-dates RFC7950. To simplify things: "Global RPC" == RFC7950 rpc "Routed RPC" == RFC7950 action (except we modeled it on top of rpc) From application perspective and routing within a cluster, both should behave the same, i.e. requests are routed to the nearest registered implementation, be it the local node or some remote node. It is not prohibited to have multiple implementations registered for either at any given time. Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
