I added cluster logs to the bug.

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:00 AM, Jozef Bacigál <jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech> 
> wrote:
> 
> Luis can you send me the karaf logs you made with DEBUG ?
> 
> Jozef
> Od: Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>>
> Odoslané: štvrtok, 20. apríla 2017 3:01:56
> Komu: Miroslav Macko; controller-dev
> Kópia: Jozef Bacigál; openflowplugin-dev; 
> integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org 
> <mailto:integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org>
> Predmet: Re: [integration-dev] CSIT test bugs
>  
> CC-ing controller-dev anyway,
> 
> These messages shown in one of the candidates (.101) after OF device owner 
> (.103) is killed. RPC "add-flow" to the candidate (.101) which is not the new 
> owner will fail until we see the message *Leader can perform its duties 
> again* below after few mins.
> 
> This behavior is not observed in Boron where RPC works very quickly after OF 
> device owner is killed.
> 
> Current bug: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8185 
> <https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8185>
> 
> BR/Luis
> 
> 
>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> I activated DEBUG for openflow and again I do not see anything conclusive, 
>> however I observed following cluster logging in the candidate instance I 
>> send the RPC and fails:
>> 
>> 2017-04-19 23:45:48,003 | INFO  | ult-dispatcher-4 | 
>> kka://opendaylight-cluster-data <kka://opendaylight-cluster-data>) | 179 - 
>> com.typesafe.akka.slf4j - 2.4.17 | Cluster Node 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550>] - Leader can 
>> currently not perform its duties, reachability status: 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550> -> 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550: 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550:> Unreachable 
>> [Unreachable] (1), akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550> -> 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550: 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550:> Unreachable 
>> [Unreachable] (4)], member status: 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550> Up seen=true, 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550> Up seen=true, 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550> Up seen=false]
>> 
>> 2017-04-19 23:46:27,990 | INFO  | ult-dispatcher-6 | 
>> kka://opendaylight-cluster-data <kka://opendaylight-cluster-data>) | 179 - 
>> com.typesafe.akka.slf4j - 2.4.17 | Cluster Node 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550>] - Leader can 
>> currently not perform its duties, reachability status: 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550> -> 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550: 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550:> Unreachable 
>> [Unreachable] (1), akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550> -> 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550: 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550:> Unreachable 
>> [Unreachable] (4)], member status: 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550> Up seen=true, 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550> Up seen=true, 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550> Up seen=false]
>> 
>> 2017-04-19 23:47:28,000 | INFO  | ult-dispatcher-3 | 
>> kka://opendaylight-cluster-data <kka://opendaylight-cluster-data>) | 179 - 
>> com.typesafe.akka.slf4j - 2.4.17 | Cluster Node 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550>] - Leader can 
>> currently not perform its duties, reachability status: 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550> -> 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550: 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550:> Unreachable 
>> [Unreachable] (1), akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550> -> 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550: 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550:> Unreachable 
>> [Unreachable] (4)], member status: 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550> Up seen=true, 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550> Up seen=true, 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550> Up seen=false]
>> 
>> 2017-04-19 23:48:28,000 | INFO  | ult-dispatcher-3 | 
>> kka://opendaylight-cluster-data <kka://opendaylight-cluster-data>) | 179 - 
>> com.typesafe.akka.slf4j - 2.4.17 | Cluster Node 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550>] - Leader can 
>> currently not perform its duties, reachability status: 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550> -> 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550: 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550:> Unreachable 
>> [Unreachable] (1), akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550> -> 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550: 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550:> Unreachable 
>> [Unreachable] (4)], member status: 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550> Up seen=true, 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.102:2550> Up seen=true, 
>> akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.103:2550> Up seen=false]
>> 
>> 2017-04-19 23:48:31,999 | INFO  | lt-dispatcher-17 | 
>> kka://opendaylight-cluster-data <kka://opendaylight-cluster-data>) | 179 - 
>> com.typesafe.akka.slf4j - 2.4.17 | Cluster Node 
>> [akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550 
>> <akka.tcp://opendaylight-cluster-data@192.168.0.101:2550>] - Leader can 
>> perform its duties again
>> 
>> Also the RPC seems to work after the last line which is at least 3 mins 
>> after the owner goes down. Any idea what is going on or should we involve 
>> cluster people here?
>> 
>> BR/Luis
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:59 PM, Miroslav Macko <miroslav.ma...@pantheon.tech 
>>> <mailto:miroslav.ma...@pantheon.tech>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Luis it would be great, if you can try with DEBUG on 
>>> org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.impl.
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot,
>>> Miro
>>> Od: Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>>
>>> Odoslané: streda, 19. apríla 2017 5:57:35
>>> Komu: Jozef Bacigál
>>> Kópia: openflowplugin-dev; Miroslav Macko; 
>>> integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org 
>>> <mailto:integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org>
>>> Predmet: Re: [integration-dev] CSIT test bugs
>>>  
>>> As far as I can tell the issue is not consistent, using local robot 
>>> automation I can reproduce after a while trying. The log of the failing RPC 
>>> instance does not show anything extraordinary, can you provide some DEBUG I 
>>> can try?
>>> 
>>> BR/Luis
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> OK, let me see if I find a way for easy reproduction.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 3:52 AM, Jozef Bacigál <jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech 
>>>>> <mailto:jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Luis to the Cluster issue 2)
>>>>> 
>>>>> it is failing always, because we were not able to reproduce it. Miroslav 
>>>>> started 3 node cluster with 3 switches connected to all controllers. If 
>>>>> send to any controler any RPC comming witout error. After killing master 
>>>>> a new master is elected and if sended an RPC to any controller is still 
>>>>> ok. RPC comming without error. Is there any other way to do it ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tested on master actual master branch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jozef
>>>>> Od: Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> Odoslané: piatok, 14. apríla 2017 21:30:41
>>>>> Komu: openflowplugin-dev
>>>>> Kópia: integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org 
>>>>> <mailto:integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org>
>>>>> Predmet: [integration-dev] CSIT test bugs
>>>>>  
>>>>> It is been a while, lets review current CSIT test bugs after latest 
>>>>> patches:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Boron and Carbon bugs:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1) Switch scalability regression due to missing table miss flows. I think 
>>>>> table miss application does not scale and that impacts scalability test.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8103 
>>>>> <https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8103>
>>>>> Tracked: 
>>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-sw-scalability-daily-only-boron/plot/Switch%20Scalability
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-periodic-sw-scalability-daily-only-boron/plot/Switch%20Scalability>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Carbon "cluster" bugs:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1) Switch is still seen after owner goes down in non OFHA scenario.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6459 
>>>>> <https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6459>
>>>>> Tracked: 
>>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-daily-only-carbon
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-daily-only-carbon>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2) Send RPC to non-owner after original owner is killed is not stable in 
>>>>> Carbon.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8185 
>>>>> <https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8185>
>>>>> Tracked: 
>>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-carbon
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-carbon>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 3) Cluster perf regression in Carbon:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6755 
>>>>> <https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6755>
>>>>> Tracked: 
>>>>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-daily-only-carbon/
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-periodic-bulkomatic-clustering-daily-only-carbon/>
>>>>> 
>>>>> BR/Luis
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> integration-dev mailing list
>>>>> integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org 
>>>>> <mailto:integration-...@lists.opendaylight.org>
>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/integration-dev 
>>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/integration-dev>
_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to