+controller-dev, because error observed here is probably coming from controller.


________________________________
Od: Tomáš Slušný <tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech>
Odoslané: piatok, 16. júna 2017 12:28
Komu: Faseela K; Michael Vorburger; openflowplugin-dev
Kópia: netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org
Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [genius-dev] Karaf 4 distribution with (just) 
genius features, for your local testing


Hi Faseela,


I observed that it is not working today too, but yesterday when I tested it it 
was working (and according to your replies, it was working also for you for a 
while). I posted reply with my observations here: 
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8694 and in short it looks it 
there is some problem with org.opendaylight.controller/sal-cluster-admin-api 
dependency what is causing feature installation to fail.


Regards,

Tomas Slusny

________________________________
Od: Faseela K <faseel...@ericsson.com>
Odoslané: štvrtok, 15. júna 2017 18:56
Komu: Faseela K; Michael Vorburger; openflowplugin-dev; Tomáš Slušný
Kópia: netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org
Predmet: RE: [openflowplugin-dev] [genius-dev] Karaf 4 distribution with (just) 
genius features, for your local testing


Hold on, there are still issues when I built a fresh distribution once again 
with the genius karaf4 patch.

Ports are still not coming up..



Thanks,

Faseela



From: openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org 
[mailto:openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Faseela 
K
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 8:24 PM
To: Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com>; openflowplugin-dev 
<openflowplugin-...@lists.opendaylight.org>; Tomáš Slušný 
<tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech>
Cc: netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [genius-dev] Karaf 4 distribution with (just) 
genius features, for your local testing



Hi Michael,



   With Tomas’ fixes on openflowplugin and openflowjava, I have tested basic 
functionalities of genius karaf4 distribution eg : creating tunnels, and 
configuring l2vlan interfaces etc, and it works fine.

   We will be running whole genius csit, on the distribution now, and report 
issues if any.



Thanks,

Faseela



From: Michael Vorburger [mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 9:41 PM
To: Faseela K <faseel...@ericsson.com<mailto:faseel...@ericsson.com>>; 
openflowplugin-dev 
<openflowplugin-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-...@lists.opendaylight.org>>;
 Tomáš Slušný <tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech<mailto:tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech>>
Cc: 
netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org>; 
genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org>
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [genius-dev] Karaf 4 distribution with (just) 
genius features, for your local testing



On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Faseela K 
<faseel...@ericsson.com<mailto:faseel...@ericsson.com>> wrote:

Hi,

  Both of your patches are on verify -1 due to SFT failures, are they 
interdependent?



I had a quick look, and both of these failures look very similar to this 
https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/ovsdb-dev/2017-June/004315.html and 
this https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/netvirt-dev/2017-June/004693.html 
stuff - something wrong / missing re the xml:config in features, again. (I 
don't understand why we're suddenly seeing these failures everywhere...)

Tomáš, do you think based on the fixes that went into ovsdb and federation you 
can similarly do the necessary for openflowplugin and openflowjava  as well?

> Do you still want me to test by doing a skipTest?



I suspect that you'd probably hit the same problem that SFT detected, just 
instead of during the build only when you actually install the feature... the 
point of SFT is just to detect it earlier. So the root cause of the these 2 
problems should probably be fixed, first.



Thanks,

Faseela



From: Tomáš Slušný 
[mailto:tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech<mailto:tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech>]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 8:15 PM
To: Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com<mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com>>; 
Faseela K <faseel...@ericsson.com<mailto:faseel...@ericsson.com>>; 
openflowplugin-dev 
<openflowplugin-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:openflowplugin-...@lists.opendaylight.org>>
Cc: 
netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org>; 
genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org>
Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [genius-dev] Karaf 4 distribution with (just) 
genius features, for your local testing



Hi Faseela,



there was some issues with copying initial configuration files in 
OpenFlowPlugin and OpenFlowJava projects, I created patches on gerrit:

* OpenFlowPlugin: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/58956

* OpenFlowJava: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/58955



and opened critical bugs for both of projects on BugZilla here:

* OpenFlowPlugin: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8693

* OpenFlowJava: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8692



This missing initial configuration file in OpenFlowJava was causing that 
SwitchConnectionProvider do not found configuration for it, and so it was not 
started properly, and so it was not listening on any ports. Can you try to test 
it on those 2 patches (or atleast on OpenFlowJava patch, that is the more 
important one) to confirm that it is working for you? I tested this locally and 
on that 2 patches, it was working on Karaf 4 again, ports was opened and 
devices was able to connect.



Regards,

Tomas Slusny

________________________________

Od: Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com<mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com>>
Odoslané: streda, 14. júna 2017 13:43
Komu: Faseela K; openflowplugin-dev
Kópia: 
netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org>; 
genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org>
Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [genius-dev] Karaf 4 distribution with (just) 
genius features, for your local testing



+openflowplugin-dev:

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Faseela K 
<faseel...@ericsson.com<mailto:faseel...@ericsson.com>> wrote:

Hi Michael,



  Took your patch, built distribution, but openflowplugin ports are not opening 
up on karaf4 distribution, however the same works on karaf3 distribution.

could you raise a new Blocker bug in openflowpluginabout this, and link it to 
https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 ?   Currently, "officially" 
there "are no blocking problems", and so the Karaf 4 will go ahead as planned.. 
I think it's very important over the coming days to give clear public 
visibility of the situation.

FYI: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8640 was an issue in 
openflowjava, but that one is closed. (And indeed that NPE is gone, I verified; 
so instead of re-opening that, we need a new one.)



Will debug some  more and keep you posted.



Thanks,

Faseela



From: 
genius-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:genius-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org>
 
[mailto:genius-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:genius-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org>]
 On Behalf Of Michael Vorburger
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 4:34 PM
To: genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:genius-...@lists.opendaylight.org>
Subject: [genius-dev] Karaf 4 distribution with (just) genius features, for 
your local testing



Hello fellow geniusians,

as discussed and committed to during our weekly call last Thursday, I've just 
taken a moment to create https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/58726/ for a 
Karaf 4 distribution with (just) genius features.

Faseela, and others interested, you volunteered during that call to take this 
first genius Karaf 4 distribution for a spin for some local functional testing, 
right? I'm curious what you'll find - basically works just fine? Or completely 
broken? ;-)

Let us use https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8661 to record any 
findings (and required actions) in this regard... I suggest you do not overload 
that single bug, but only use it as an "umbrella", and create new linked issues 
for anything you find. I've already done the same for two (very minor) more 
"technical" issues I've noticed when even just starting it up empty.

Tx,

M.

--

Michael Vorburger, Red Hat
vorbur...@redhat.com<mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com> | IRC: vorburger @freenode | 
~ = http://vorburger.ch<http://vorburger.ch/>





Tomáš Slušný

Software Developer



PANTHEON technologies s.r.o.

Janka Kráľa 9, 974 01 Banská Bystrica

Slovakia

Tel / +421 220 665 111



MAIL / tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech<mailto:tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech>

WEB / https://pantheon.tech








Tomáš Slušný
Software Developer

PANTHEON technologies s.r.o.
Janka Kráľa 9, 974 01 Banská Bystrica
Slovakia
Tel / +421 220 665 111

MAIL / tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech
WEB / https://pantheon.tech



Tomáš Slušný
Software Developer

PANTHEON technologies s.r.o.
Janka Kráľa 9, 974 01 Banská Bystrica
Slovakia
Tel / +421 220 665 111

MAIL / tomas.slu...@pantheon.tech
WEB / https://pantheon.tech


_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to