Yes they are clustered, only one node actually connects to the device and requests from the other nodes are forwarded through it. MountInstance itself isn't clustered but the netconf dataBroker registered inside it is. It's all in the netconf-topology-singleton package.
Tomas From: controller-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:controller-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Vikram Darsi Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 04:36 To: netconf-...@lists.opendaylight.org; controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: [controller-dev] Are the NETCONF devices mounted are clustered? Hi Team We have a three-node cluster, say, C1, C2, C3. A NETCONF device is connected to C1 and hence MountInstance is created on the Node C1, is this mount instance accessible/available for other nodes C2,C3 to perform device read/writes (I mean, are the mount instances clustered?)? If the MountInstances are clustered, please point us to the classes where this is being implemented in NETCONF project And when they are not clustered, is it correct the same device connects to all the three nodes in the cluster, and still be shown as one NETCONF node to the north bound(say, when I query using RESTCONF)? Thanks for the support in advance. Regards Vikram
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev