On 09/08/17 08:10, Muthukumaran K wrote:
> Hi Robert / Vratko, 
> 
> Going through Vratko's gerrit, I noticed following 
> 
> "Prefix-based shards do not even support "non-chained" transactions"
> 
> I assume that this caveat is applicable only for the prefix-based sharding 
> and does not necessarily hold good for those who continue to use module-based 
> sharding. Am I correct ?

Correct. That statement reflects the fact that prefix-based shards are
built on top of producer/consumer APIs.

Regards,
Robert


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to