On 09/08/17 08:10, Muthukumaran K wrote:
> Hi Robert / Vratko, 
> Going through Vratko's gerrit, I noticed following 
> "Prefix-based shards do not even support "non-chained" transactions"
> I assume that this caveat is applicable only for the prefix-based sharding 
> and does not necessarily hold good for those who continue to use module-based 
> sharding. Am I correct ?

Correct. That statement reflects the fact that prefix-based shards are
built on top of producer/consumer APIs.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

controller-dev mailing list

Reply via email to