On 09/08/17 08:10, Muthukumaran K wrote: > Hi Robert / Vratko, > > Going through Vratko's gerrit, I noticed following > > "Prefix-based shards do not even support "non-chained" transactions" > > I assume that this caveat is applicable only for the prefix-based sharding > and does not necessarily hold good for those who continue to use module-based > sharding. Am I correct ?
Correct. That statement reflects the fact that prefix-based shards are built on top of producer/consumer APIs. Regards, Robert
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list email@example.com https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev