On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Muthukumaran K <muthukumara...@ericsson.com > wrote:
> BZ 9034 : > <quote> > (1) a lot of those "ERROR ShardDataTree > org.opendaylight.controller.sal-distributed-datastore > - 1.5.2.Carbon | member-0-shard-default-operational: Failed to commit > transaction ... java.lang.IllegalStateException: Store tree > org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.data.api.schema.tree.spi. > MaterializedContainerNode@78fe0203 and candidate base > org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.data.api.schema.tree.spi > .MaterializedContainerNode@686861e8 differ" errors - seems vaguely > familiar from recent list posts, someone remind me what were those that all > about again? > </quote> > > The symptom seems similar to the one observed during PreLeader fix. But > that was done long long back in Be itself. > > Michael, is any restart involved in testing ? > Muthu, no its not a restart scenario. Its started once and constantly running bombarded with Rally suite. But Robert's latest post on this email thread says that this must be caused by an application not closing a TransactionChain somewhere - I'm looking into this now; and will update https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9034 ... Regards > Muthu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: controller-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto: > controller-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Robert Varga > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 5:12 PM > To: Michael Vorburger; controller-dev; mdsal-...@lists.opendaylight.org > Subject: Re: [controller-dev] OOM Bug 9034 > > On 23/08/17 13:33, Robert Varga wrote: > >> As far as I can see, with my still very limited understanding of > >> mdsal internals, this does not seem to be the same as our earlier > >> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8941 raised by Stephen > >> and fixed by Robert (which is being follow-up on in > >> https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9028 by Robert and Tom) > >> - does this initial quick analysis seem accurate to you? > > 9034 looks like 8941, except it's not transactions, but chains. I'll > > cook up a prototype. > > Actually no. The backend side of things looks okay, as chains are being > both closed and purged when requested from the frontend. > > I suspect somebody is forgetting to close their transaction chains... > > Regards, > Robert > >
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
