On 13/11/17 20:09, Michael Vorburger wrote: > > Or is a huge ShardDataTree just perfectly normal, because that's the > in-memory database? Must we just bump up our Xmx of 2 GB to much more > for this to be able to work at scale?
Hard to say, but a large FrontendMetadata part could indicate dangling transactions or similar. Bye, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
