If you end up taking this on let me know, and I will abandon [0]. I had originally done this to avoid a ton of unused CLI related code in gen'd code.
Regards, Ryan Goulding [0] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/67070/ On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 5:03 AM, Sam Hague <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Michael Vorburger <vorbur...@redhat.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Michael Vorburger < >>>> vorbur...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Michael Vorburger < >>>>>> vorbur...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Michael Vorburger < >>>>>>> vorbur...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Michael Vorburger < >>>>>>>> vorbur...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> almost 3 months ago, on https://lists.opendaylight. >>>>>>>>> org/pipermail/controller-dev/2017-September/013889.html, I had >>>>>>>>> started a thread re. the mysterious problems hit in the controller >>>>>>>>> archetype "self test", which occured on Gerrit and Jenkins, and only >>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>> (it worked locally even 3 months ago). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Today I finally made time to progress on this, and >>>>>>>>> https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1799 has the >>>>>>>>> write up what is going on there, documented for future reference. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is this feasible to get an odlparent 3.0.2 with >>>>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/65940/ for >>>>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/65941/ ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tx, >>>>>>>>> M. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PS: I'm hoping to work on https://jira.opendaylight.org/ >>>>>>>>> browse/INFRAUTILS-17 in the coming days, which will likely also >>>>>>>>> require a change in odlparent; perhaps this and that could be pooled >>>>>>>>> together into a 3.0.2 - anything else? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66030/ and its related >>>>>>>> changes are what I meant here; if all of this, together with >>>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/65940/, could be released >>>>>>>> as an odlparent 3.0.2, in the hopefully not-too-distant future, that >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> be fabulous. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> would any fellow controller commiter be willing to merge this >>>>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/65941/ now? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tom, or even I volunteer to, then rebase https://git.opendayligh >>>>>>> t.org/gerrit/#/c/66545/ on top of that c/65941 and then I'm happy >>>>>>> to merge that one after. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It would be good to get both of these archetype things into Oxygen >>>>>>> still IMHO. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Agree - I rebased - will merge after >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> just done, but hit https://jira.opendaylight. >>>>> org/browse/CONTROLLER-1810 .. following the Big Bump, the Archetype >>>>> IT is actually broken.. seems to have something to do with some (shutdown >>>>> related?) problem in AAA ? Don't be shy to comment on CONTROLLER-1810 if >>>>> you have any clue what could be causing that. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I'm hoping to merge https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66545/ >>>>> with that @Ignore ASAP anyway, if nobody has any objections; we can then >>>>> subsquently remove the @Ignore in the archetype IT, when CONTROLLER-1810 >>>>> is >>>>> sorted. >>>>> >>>> >>>> FYI https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66545/ is now finally >>>> merged, but without IT; in addition to https://jira.opendaylight.o >>>> rg/browse/CONTROLLER-1810 there seems to be a second (new?) problem >>>> with the IT of the archetype, detailed in https://jira.opendaylight.o >>>> rg/browse/CONTROLLER-1811. >>>> >>>> What are people's views re. ditching the IT and/or CLI (suggested by >>>> Sam & Tom) from the archetype? >>>> >>> >>> I think we should keep the startup archetype simple/basic and have an >>> advanced archetype that has the extra fluff IT, CLI etc. >>> >> That's a good idea. This gets the basic users moving forward much easier. >> And if they really want something more than can run the advanced version. >> > > That works for me too. Not ditch/remove the IT and/or CLI, but move into > an "advanced" archetype. > > Because the current archetype is well known, let us keep that one as the > existing basic one? > > I wonder if we shold have a new "full" archetype, which would duplicate > stuff from the basic (shame.. won't be keep consistent), or we could have > something which augments / adds the IT and CLI to an existing basic > archetype? > > _______________________________________________ > controller-dev mailing list > controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev > >
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
