On 07/06/18 19:14, Michael Vorburger wrote: > Robert, > > just to avoid any misunderstandings and unnecessary extra work to throw > away, may we double check and confirm that we correctly understand your > comment in https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/GENIUS-138 to mean that > we are past the "dependency of a mature project on an incubation > project" objection and you are now OK with that > we resurrect https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/64522/, to first > move infrautils.DiagStatus integration for datastore from genius to > controller? We would then improve it, in controller instead of genius, > for the improvement proposed in issue GENIUS-138.
Hello Michael, my point is duplicity of information, i.e. I very much want to have a single point of source of the data, with others being adaptations of that source. If you are saying that DiagStatus can supplant the information provided in JMX, fine. If not, than DiagStatus should rely on that JMX endpoint -- I think the complexity you implied in GENIUS-138 does not exist, but there was reaction around that point. So rather than rolling in yet another framework, let's have the discussion: in what ways it is superior to JMX? Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
