On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:58 AM Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote:

> On 07/11/2018 02:07, Ajay Lele wrote:
> > Hi Controller-devs,
> >
> > [0] changed EOS behavior such that a non-voting member cannot become
> > entity owner. But there are some situations where we want to allow this
> > e.g. when BGP speaker config is local to node and not replicated in
> > cluster. I think the behavior should be that non-voting member will not
> > become entity owner *provided* one or more voting candidates are
> > available. Thoughts?
>
> This is a sticky topic. Non-voting members are meant to be used for
> geo-redundancy only, in which case non-voting side should be really
> passive.
>
> Can you describe the deployment scenario in more detail?
>

One scenario is BGP route injection using application RIB. Injected route
will be withdrawn when BGP connection over which it is advertised goes
down. To prevent downtime window when primary to DR cutover happens, BGP
connection is established from non-voting member from DR site as well. This
is accomplished by moving BGP speaker data to a separate shard which is not
replicated.


> Thanks,
> Robert
>
>
_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to