On 13/11/2018 17:45, Michael Vorburger wrote: > Hello, > > In https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/77640/ > for https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/OPNFLWPLUG-1046 the question > has come up how to correctly wire the ping pong DataBroker when > following the https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Using_Blueprint > documentation. > > One of the possible options, which would seem simplest and clearest to > me, would be to introduce a new interface PingPongDataBroker extends > DataBroker, and bind to and @Inject that. Would the controller/mdsal > projects be open for a change proposing this, or is that a stupid idea?
It is an implementation, I do not believe each implementation should have its own interface. The proper way is via an implementation property, just like we're doing it now. Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
