Rob Landley wrote:

<snippage>

Erg. Very rarely have I seen many pages that are nice, efficiently done,
and follow standards done by professional web designers. Not attempting
to deride whomever you were getting to look at it, but just my
experience. (Let's make it a fixed width of 800 pixels by using tables
and then have some JavaScript to compensate for Netscape 4's inadequacy
to work with CSSv1 for this...)

The alternative is to have something that looks bland and/or terrible.

I've cleaned up the output of a professional web designer before, it's not that hard. (Yes, even the horrors frontpage produces.) It's not a major problem, it's just work.


Okay. I just regularly have to look at the design, then recreate it from scratch, since trying to manually covert tables to divs is too much trouble. Whatever you want.


<snip snip. Oh wait, did you want that>

Too many cooks here. Which one of you is going to be web master?

I'm more than willing, but if Troy really wants to, I can't really force him otherwise since it's his server.


(Keep in mind that I'm going to be submitting content, but I won't be webmaster. Other people are also probably going to be submitting content to the webmaster.

Rob mentioned a means for other people to submit content to the front page as a log of sorts, so I suggest Movable Type. He then cringed as he said he hated the interface, then I said I'd look into Slashcode then. He also intimated he hated that...unless anyone has a better idea for setting up a system for updates on the main page other than giving everyone a shell login and having them edit via vi, I was going to suggest Movable Type.


 Last time we delegated individual pages to avoid stepping on each
other's toes...)

<steps on Rob's toe>


--
Mark A. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(512) 796-3592




Reply via email to