On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > > 2) The keyboard is not ok for the four key at the <RETURN> with french > > > keyboard. > > > > Sorry, I don't understand. > The '$', '�', '%', '^' keys does not return the good characters on the > console when I use it. > Using Linux keycodes has some "issues" on various keyboards. The French one seems to be the worst in this area. You can roll back to using Mac keycodes, using Sylvain's HowTo, or if you want to contribute a better keymap, that would be welcome too. > > > > > 3) Please, can you move am-utils and libamu2 to the first CD, I think > > > this is more important that some other. > > > > Current am-utils doesn't build. I'm tracking the x86 rpmslist for the > > most part, except for necessary PPC packages that need to be on CD1. Since > > we promote supermount, I suspect am-utils is secondary in ranking. > > > > > 4) The most important, I am rebuilding some plf package for ppc, but the > > > make failed if %make is invoked in spec file. The make directive work > > > properly but I think this is a bad optmisation flag but I can't help you > > > for that. I have just the message "fg, no job running". > > > > What package? Generally you'll see that from an undefined rpm macro or > > other issue in the .spec file. > I haven't (yet) find a mdk package with %make in build step but at > http://nanardon.homelinux.org/mdk.php you will find xsnow. I rebuild this > package for me and send it to Lenny, it is not (yet) on contrib but it work > very fine on x86 cooker. Can you test it on your system. > > For I have: > + cd xsnow-1.42 > + xmkmf > mv -f Makefile Makefile.bak > imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config > + %make depend > /net/tmp/rpm-tmp.45456: fg: no job control > error: Bad exit status from /net/tmp/rpm-tmp.45456 (%build) > > > Lot's of packages use %make. For some reason it's not being interpreted on your system: + cd xsnow-1.42 + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /home/stew/tmp/rpm-tmp.12047 + umask 022 + cd /home/stew/rpm/BUILD + cd xsnow-1.42 + xmkmf mv -f Makefile Makefile.bak imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config + make depend makedepend -- -I/usr/X11R6/include -Dlinux -D__powerpc__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DUSE_MAKEDEPEND -- xsnow.c toon_root.c xsnow.h vroot.h + make xsnow built fine here. %make is not much as rpm macros go: [stew@powerbook-cooker SPECS]$ rpm --eval=%make make [stew@powerbook-cooker SPECS]$ grep make /usr/lib/rpm/macros %__make /usr/bin/make > > > 5) I think you know the problem, XFree does not work properly with > > > rage128, this problem appear in first beta for x86 and is corrected now. > > > ( I have a rage 128 on my athlon and my ppc is a titanium with rage 128, > > > in fact, in 4 computer, I have only ATI card, rage 64 or rage 128 ;-) > > > > You're saying r128 is OK now - correct? > For x86 arch, same problem, perparps same solution... > OK, so I guess the new X rpms that I asked everyone to test on r128 were not OK? This would be XFree86-4.2.0-10.1mdk.ppc.rpm. You guys leave me in a bit of a predicament. I don't have a r128 machine. I was told there was an issue, and reworked the package, asking folks to test it, and was then told things were fine. Released the new package and now you tell me it's broken. So should we start the process over again? Stew Benedict -- MandrakeSoft PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/PPC/FAQ/
