On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:

> OK, I get the picture... As far as I can see currently both packages
> will
> only build if there is a (older?) version of the package already
> installed.
> Hmm, this _could_ get you into trouble --> possible lib inconsitancy

no could _would_

> (true 
> or bullshit?). It's probably preferable that the packages can be built 
> without already being installed... That being said, how many more
> packages 
> have a similiar construction? Are they also depending on their (older-) 
> installed sister to build?
> 
> OK, How are we going to fix this? Make a patch so the "-L"'s are set
> correctly?

Let you know when i finger out what they did, seems gcc's none functional
(again) I know it used to go a lot farther then the first imake :)

> Greetings,
> 
> Stefan
> 

-- 
MandrakeSoft          http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
                                        --Axalon

Reply via email to