Pixel wrote:
> > Of the two forms, the first is preferred. This is seman-
> > tically equivalent to
> >
> > >word 2>&1
>
> yep, but relying on this in initscripts is nasty and doesn't work unless you
> specify #!/bin/bash instead of #!/bin/sh (even if sh is a link to bash)
Perhaps while we're on the subject, I realize even if /bin/sh and
/bin/bash are the same file that they run differently depending on how
you call them, but should sh really be a symlink to bash? I believe on
Debian, for example, they are two separate packages.
--
Sincerely,
David Walluck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
