Kaixo!
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:38:27PM -0500, David Walluck wrote:
> > It shouldn't I think.
> > %{_arch} (not the same as arch !) should be the *generic* architecture;
> > that is 'i386' for all PCs, 'alpha' for all alphas etc.
> > Look at the kernel spec file for example, %{_arch} is used for selecting
> > the arch/... directory of linuxsources; that is %{_arch} can be only one of
> > alpha arm i386 m68k mips ppc sparc sparc64
>
> This is what I am wondering. k6 is binary compatible with i586, so i386
> as ExclusiveArch, should cover all of i586, i686, k6, and k7... why it
> doesn't seems to be a bug. I know you shouldn't have to explcitly type
> out all i386 compatible archs.
%ifarch xxx
and exlusivearch: xxx
use $RPM_BUILD_ARCH in fact, and not %{_arch}.
maybe that should indeed be changed on the rpm source code.
But a way to distinguish different cpus is needed too.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> David Walluck
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Ki �a vos v�ye b�n,
Pablo Saratxaga
http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/ PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975
