On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> >From: Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [Cooker] Still unable to use vmware with last kernel
> >Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 21:04:37 -0600
> >
> >On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> > > That's the one I am using. I don't want to install the 2.3 kernel, but
> >it's
> > > good news, Thanks.
> > > -=-
> > > kk1
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Alwyn Schoeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Subject: Re: [Cooker] Still unable to use vmware with last kernel
> > > >Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 11:56:37 +0200
> > > >
> > > >Try VMWare for Linux 2.0 Beta, I'm using it with kernel 2.3.40 and it
> > > >works,
> > > >might work for you 2 :)
> >
> > Seems like the problem is the kernel headers....the
> >/usr/src/linux/include/linux/version-up.h file says
> >
> >#define UTS_RELEASE "2.2.14-1mdk"
> >
> >while uname -r reports:
> >
> >[vox@vox vox]$ uname -r
> >2.2.14-1mdklinus
> >
> >and vmware module building doesn't like that at all....is this only
> >my case or what? btw, this is happening in two different boxes with
> >Mdk7 in em.
> >
> Mmmh... looks OK here:
> $ cat /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version-up.h
> #define UTS_RELEASE "2.2.15-0.7mdk"
> #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 131599
> #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
>
> $ uname -r
> 2.2.15-0.7mdk
>
> I am using the standard kernel, not the "linus" one.
Mmm....this makes less sence every time I read a msg in this
thread...2.2.15-0.7mdk?? there's no such thing in ftp.tux.org nor in
my CD (burned ISO)....there's a bunch of different 2.2.14-15mdk's,
plus the linus-2.2.14-1mdk one I'm running...so...now I'm completely
mixed up...where did that 2.2.15 come from?
--
Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs.
Kind of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use
_higher_ technology than everyone else.
-- Donald B. Marti Jr.
