hi,
eeeh ...i should ahve read that.
got fooled by the appwatch "stable". ;-)
geoffrey lee (snail talk)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 11:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] parted 1.1.1
>
>
> "geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > but the new stable is 1.1.1 ..it's not a devel..
>
> from the README:
>
> GNU Parted 1.1.x development series
>
> THIS IS UNSTABLE SOFTWARE.
>
> If you are not helping with development, then we recommend you
> use the versions
> labled 1.0.x.
>
>
> >
> > btw, just wondering with mdk rpms, when when a hack and stable rpm both
> > exist, and a new stable come out, should i use the stable rpm
> to udpate, or
> > the hack one?
>
> well it depends. For perl as an example, hackperl will be better
> to use when 5.6
> is out. Just remove the !warning! in the %description.
>
