geoffrey lee wrote:
> no, i did that a couple of days ago. i renamed the package, you see.
> it's called hackgimp now. 1.1.x is devel ...and it should not be called
> gimp.
You should reconsider this naming change. If you must add a "hack",
the place is at the end, NOT the beginning. hackgimp is still a
gimp and must appear on the mirrors (rpmfind, etc) under G and under
gimp, NOT under hack. I see no value at all in collecting all the
hack releases together under hack. Does anyone?
The best way to indicate a hack would be
gimp-1.1.18-1mdkhack.i586.rpm
--
Regards,
Ron. [AU] - sent by Linux.
