hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian J. Murrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 12:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Cooker] Re[2]: suggsetion for bash
>
>
> from the quill of geoffrey lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > It is my understanding that 3.0.4 "proper" of RPM has not been
> > released
> > > which is why we are using decimal releases. Is that not the case?
> >
> > no, 3.0.4 is all well and final. :)
>
> Then IMHO it should not be on decimal releases either then. If rpm.org
uh huh.
> make _any_ change and cut a new tarball they will update the version
> number at which time so should Mandrake and then cycle the release back
> to 1mdk. Having a goal of every package being at 1mdk when the next
> Linux Mandrake release goes out is just silly, IMHO. Think of it in
> terms of all of the "Cookers" out there. We will all have to update
> *every* single package on our cooker boxes needlessly (for nothing more
> than release stamping) just so that our cooker boxes lineup with the
> final release. Silly.
>
> > i'm not sure, either i'm wrong or
> > rpm.org html is out of date ...but you know you can find rpm 3.0.4 in
> > the distrib (forgot the absolute name) ftp directory.
>
> Then why are we decimal releasing it?
as i said: it's the final realease. please look at the changelog. if you
dont'w ant to download the whole rpm to look at the changlog, you nca use
the rpm2html tool on rufus.
glibc is final and it is at 0.2mdk..
>
> > alpha software
> > wouldn't go there ...
>
> Agreed. See my previous question then.
>
> b.
>
>
> --
> Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support
> Services, Inc.
> North Vancouver, B.C.
> 604 983 UNIX
> Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
>
