Hello,
I have to work with a crowd who's basic attitude seems to be 'take me now
Bill'. They cannot understand why I like to try / use Mozilla despite its
problems, they cannot understand why I have a colourful screen background and
the worst sin of all - not using Windows Explorer and opening a seperate window
for every directory.
So now you know what I'm up against !
The latest 'Linux is crap because' are :
1) 'Linux is only capable of blocking'. I thought Unix became non blocking about
1980, but I'm not sure. If it did I assume Linux is as well.
2) NT / 2000 are completely object oriented from the ground up. Linux / Unix
are 'monolithoc monstrosities that wouldn't know an object it it bit them'. I
really don't know if the Linux kernel is OO or not.
3) 'Linux / Unix is only capable of non pre-emptive scheduling, which is crap
compared to the vastly superior MS models'. Again, I have no answer to this.
Please give me some info. so I can answer these neanderthals correctly,
Thanks,
Owen
