On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 12:28:07PM -0600, Lord And Master;) wrote:
> Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> > "Lord And Master;)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > what problems maybe I can help?
> >
> > the /usr/lib/libqt.so stuff, configure of licq search (via nm) the
> > symbols of qt2 but /usr/lib/libqt.so come from qt1.4 by default on
> > mandrake (this should be a AUTOMAKE fix).
> >
> > --
> > MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.mandrakesoft.com
> > In Travel --Chmouel
>
> with the qt2.1 libs i'm using from contrib (updated to beta 2 version
> though) everything is placed in /usr/lib/qt2.1/* and that works quite
> well because it auto maticly finds them in the latest version's of licq.
> no automake required just ./configure and done. I have gone round and
> round with the author with the /lib/libqt stuff and he has refused to
> change it to search for libqt.2 so I simply placed everything in
> /usr/lib/qt2.1 and tell it qt base is in /usr/lib/qt2.1 (although with
> 80 you don't have to do that either) and everything works flawlessly. no
> mess no fuss:) unless we plan on getting rid of qt 1.4 i don't see this
> problem going away to easily with haveing the files in the same dir.
I'm updating qt2.1 to beta3 (for koffice).
Should I use /usr/lib/qt2.1 then ?
Do you really mean /usr/lib/qt2.1/libqt.so.2.1.0 ?
Sounds like a very good idea, since /usr/lib/libqt.so.2 is already used for 2.0
--
David FAURE
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.clara.net/faure/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
