On Sat, Apr 15, 2000 at 07:08:12PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > "David Odin (aka DindinX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 09:14:33PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > version 0.9 is out for some days. 0.5 is there since october and is very
> > > > > old/buggy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could we upgrade to a more recent version.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can make the package for 0.9 if you want to.
> > > >
> > > > I would like it :-)))
> > > >
> > > OK. I'll do.
> > > >
> > > > I'm stuck on gnumeric for the moment.
> > > >
> > > :) The funny thing is that Gnumeric is the only app we have that could
> > > optionnally depends on bonobo.
> > >
> >
> > wrong,
> > see glade, libglade, nautilus, dia, the new gimp in development,
> > and many other that i've forgotten.
>
> Yes, *but* for the moment no package is compiled with bonobo support, same
> for helix packages. they don't even provide a bonobo helix.
>
> Okay for keeping it -- but don't we forget it seems quite not ready for
> the moment.
>
I have bad news about this. I've tried to compile gnumeric 0.52 with
bonobo 0.9 (both latest version) and it looks like gnumeric wants a more
recent (i.e cvs) version of bonobo.
So bonobo is completly useless for us in main distrib. :(
DindinX
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] HF Team
