Le lun 17/03/2003 � 21:55, Buchan Milne a �crit : > Can we have per-source 'skip.list's ? This has just shown up, since we run > samba-server-ldap (requires samba-common-ldap), which obsoletes and > provides samba-server (and vice versa) to allow users to move from one to > the other. All goes well however, until you get a security update for > samba, and it installs samba-server over samba-server-ldap and we have > downtime while I scp samba-server-ldap packages to the server .... and > add samba-server to the skip.list but now that I have newer ldap-enable > builds (will be on ftp.samba.org soon), I would have to take samba-server > out of the skip list again.
This sounds me a problem of using obsoletes whereas a conflicts may be better ? Fran�ois.
