-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 18 March 2003 17:44, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Per �yvind Karlsen :
> > does'nt NVIDIA usually provide binary kernel RPMS for stock kernels?
>
> My own experience with newbies and NVidia drivers leads me to avoid RPMS at
> all cost, and to prefer tar.gz: one only constant archive, while multiple
> binary RPMS availble from NVidia website is confusing. And rebuilding SRPMS
> is far much troublesome than "tar xvzf && make"
urpmi kernel-source; rpm --rebuild NVIDIA_kernel-blablabal.src.rpm; rpm -ivh 
blabla/RPMS/arch/NVIDIA_kernel-blabla-arch.rpm is'nt that hard..
it's not *that* hard

I prefer to ask people to do that in stead.. and then they'll even learn 
something;)

>
> And BTW advising people to fetch individual RPMS from outside of well-known
> repositories is a mistake IMHO.
I think the same goes for sources, at least when they come from the same 
place;)

>
> > the drivers should also be available from the club or come with boxed
> > sets..
>
> They should in theory be more adapted, but i've seens to many surprises
> with them.

- -- 
Regards,
Per �yvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+d0/Bv8F7V9JOSuURAujIAJ0cPWbzW2WDl/r0X05spDJ0wtz0XwCeK2yJ
grUA3r2Rn5BMV9gthquRgDQ=
=fRPv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to