On Sunday 30 March 2003 19:31, Edward Tandi wrote: > On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 13:03, Duncan wrote: > > On Sat 29 Mar 2003 20:23, Leon Brooks posted as excerpted below: > > > On Sunday 30 March 2003 09:00, Edward Tandi wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 17:46, webudo2 wrote: > > > >> A bugfree released MDK 9.2 > > > > > > > > Hooray! I'll vote for that. What about all those RPM requests in > > > > Ma[n]drakeClub? We should have all of them too! > > > > > > Does anyone else see the irony in this? (-: > > > > Yes. W/ the 100% bugs fixed, I'd asked myself if he was considering a > > release in late 3003 or not. Add all the club requests, AND make THEM > > 100% bug free as well, and what are we looking at now, a late 5003 > > release, perhaps? > > I wouldn't take my comment too seriously, I should have put a smiley > into that e-mail. It's just that using this mailing list as forum for > input into product direction doesn't seem right. You are bound to get "I > want this" and "I want that" and eventually it will be "I want > everything". Well of course we do! > > But I do personally think that the quality is beginning to suffer. I > think Mandrake should be releasing less frequently and have a longer > stability/testing/fixing period. If you look at the reviews of Linux > distros, the highest points are awarded to those that work with the > least number of problems. > > But at the same time, It would have been good to get more of the > Club-requested apps into the release. Its all swings and roundabouts. > > Ed-T.
No bugs is impossible. Some improvement in Bugzilla using would help a bit. What you get if you want a "No Bug"-distro you'll see if you install debian stable. I would say wrong target for mandrake , isn't it ? ;) -- Regards Steffen ____________________ counter.li.org : #296567. machine: 181800 vdr-box : 87 ____________________ Please dont CC me, since if I have replied I'll watch the tread. Both mails will be filtered to the ML-folder. Thanks
