> > And at least to up to 1.1.3 I have tested it (sorry Andrey that I did not yet > got back to you, was a bit busy) on a number of different hardware, and have > to say it works much better and stabler than 9.1 supermount :) I have not yet > found a way to break it. >
this one has some internal changes so some bugs could slip in. That is why I ask test it. I do not expect any signigicant changes more (unless some brand new feature is added or kernel API is changed). > Although I recall that Jan Ciger reported his 750 MB zip reverted to only > reporting 100 MB suddenly (this was with version 1.1.1 IIRC). But he did not > reply when I asked for more info. > Supermount reports what it gets from subfs so the only reason for this (I can think of) is that space is not reclaimed after file deletion. What fstype and what fsck says? -andrey
