----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephane Gourichon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 11:55 AM Subject: Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Address dependency issue better On Fri, 26 May 2000, Hoyt wrote: >But that's a job to extend the rpm standard and should be discussed with >the rpm maintainers, it goes beyond the work of a distribution maker, >doesn't it ? Not if they assume a leadership role in the industry, which MandrakeSoft seems destined to do. Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - ... Hoyt
- RE: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSIO... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISC... Hoyt
- [Cooker] Suugestion for new utili... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] Suugestion for n... John Cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Suugestion for n... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] Suugestion for n... Werner Trobin
- Re: [Cooker] Suugestion for n... Steven J Mackenzie
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSIO... Stephane Gourichon
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Addr... Hoyt
- [Cooker] A few urpmi-based improvements Stephane Gourichon
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Address ... Denis HAVLIK
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Randy Welch
