Re: [Cooker] Bug with G++ and 9.0

[Gwenole Beauchesne]

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Pascal Terjan wrote:

> That means a return is missing. That's not an error so I guess there is 
> a default value (maybe 0 or it is undefined, I don't know the norm) when 
> return is missing.

No, it returns current garbage.