On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 03:35, Steffen Barszus wrote: > On Monday 31 March 2003 02:41, Pierre Jarillon wrote: > > Le Lundi 31 Mars 2003 01:27, Edward Tandi a �crit : > > > > > > But I do personally think that the quality is beginning to suffer. > > > > > > I think Mandrake should be releasing less frequently and have a > > > > > > longer stability/testing/fixing period. If you look at the reviews > > > > > > of Linux distros, the highest points are awarded to those that work > > > > > > with the least number of problems. > > > > I agree with a longer stability/testing/fixing period. Now, there is enough > > of things in the distro and the main interest of the users will be the > > stability and a lower number a bug. > > IMHO, Mdk 8.2 was the best usable distro and since this time the quality > > is beginning to suffer. It is absolutly necessary to do better. > > > > For me 9.0 was the most uncomplicated version ever (haven't seen 9.1 yet ;)) > and the fastest too. > > > > The frequency of releases is not important. > > But it is imortant for getting new stuff in. Do you really think all free > software development will stop now and mandrake can lean back and focus on > stability ? > > We have to learn: > - how to use bugzilla > - how to produce usefull fixes and patches
O geez Steffen by the time I get this one right MDK 20 will be out *grin*. > > mandrake staff has to learn: > - communication ;) > - even more of the first point > > And if I got it right the improvement in the use of bugzilla was big.
