On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:51:01 -0800 Andi Payn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The mono-0.23-2mdk package installed broken scripts in /usr/bin/msc and > /usr/bin/mbas that pointed into the packager's build root. The problem is > that the script that generates these scripts expects to find the real > binaries in the install directory, which obviously isn't true when you're > packaging. This should probably be fixed properly with the mono people; for > now, I just added two lines to the specfile to overwrite these scripts. Mono-0.23-3mdk should be fine. The rest of these packages were already submitted by Quel Qun, but they needed some work for the libpolicy, and I've been a bit slow on that. Do you have a webspace where you can put these src.rpms? I don't have read access to /incoming. > The gnome-db-0.2.96-6mdk package didn't include pkgconfig support, and > wouldn't build without errors (because it installed but did not package the > help files). > > The gtk-sharp package requires my updated mono and gnome-db devel packages > to build, but binaries should install just fine with the existing versions. > > The mono packages don't install the monodoc tools or the mono documentation, > > so I didn't install the Gtk# docs either. This should probably be changed in > > the future (or maybe separate monodoc, mono-docs, and gtk-sharp-docs > packages would be better?). > > Someone should package Qt# (especially given Mandrake's slight Qt/KDE > preference), but it might be a while before I get around to it (since I've > barely even looked at Qt#). > > -- Marcel Pol
