Isn't the whole windows binaries/wine kinda pointless with VMWare around? I
know that it's a very expensive piece of software, but I've used it and it
really did much better the wine. At least it did run all my apps (except
those crucial to timing) albeit a little slow. When I get the money, I do
intend on buying a copy of it.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] [discuss] wine configuration
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 08:04:07AM -0400, Gallagher wrote:
> 1. Preconfigured Wine
> 2. Associated Wine with .exe files in KDE/Gnome
> 3. Graphical config for Wine
This is something that should be done eventually (though I'm expecting it to
be
hooked into the "support for other binaries" at the kernel level, rather
than
associations in file managers) but not in
the very near future. The Wine group is currently discussing whether they
can
shoot for a version 1.0 and what needs to be done first; I don't think that
they expect to reach that by the end of the year. I think that Wine is too
volatile right now (not that it's a bad project; far from it.)
--
Graham Percival
