Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > Though I agree, I remain skeptical as to why it has never been > > mentioned for urpmi which has the error for more than 3 years > > now. > > 1)Because MD's won't use urpmi
md? > 2)Becuase no reviewer has yet used urpmi. > > In both cases, it is feasible that the person in question would use > rpmdrake ... The ppl of the channel who report the error (huug, adamw) would more probably have used urpmi, I'd thought. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
