> Hi.
>
> I have just tried "comanche3-0b4" the apache config gui and it sucks...,
> just  wanted you all to know this.

I haven't tried comanche since I setup my first apache server, which was a
looooong time ago (in the days of Netscape 3 and IE 2!). I thought it
might be worth something in a few years, but then I learnt how to use a
text editor (which was easier ;-)).

> Maybe the redhat 9 apache2 config gui
> is  slightly better, or just works better?
>

Some of the RH9 GUIs aren't bad, but are way too limiting (especially
their samba one!). The authentication ones aren't bad.

> (just wanted to try and be innovative for 9.2;))

Oden, I really think you need to look at libconf, and give your input on
what a GUI for Apache needs to do. I have started giving Dams some ideas
for samba. libconf has a "template" (templates are regex's telling libconf
how to parse the config file) for Apache, but no GlueConf yet (maps config
file type to filename and a few other things).

Have a look on the Wiki under the Development Task. I will see if I can
adjust the simple UI Dams sent me (about two pages of perl) and the Samba
GlueConf to Apache so you can see what it looks like, but in the meantime,
install:

http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/libconf/unstable.pkg/0.19/perl-Libconf-0.19-1mdk.i586.rpm
(or rebuild the srpm from http://savannah.nongnu.org/files/?group=libconf
if you want)

Then, run perl on this file:
http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/cooker/smbconfig

(you need a /etc/samba/smb.conf for this)

It's a very basic prototype Dams sent me, just to show how libconf can be
used, and I am trying to use it to work on a template and Glueconf file
for ldap, and then maybe Kerberos (kerberos uses the same type of config
file as samba).

Take a look, and I think if everyone who knows what a regex is can bash on
libconf a bit and contribute some templates/GlueConf, we can probably get
something useable quite soon ...

If I had more perl experience ....

(Dams, hope you don't mind me evangelising libconf a bit .. I think it
rocks from what I have seen so far)

Regards,
Buchan



Reply via email to