Viestiss� Torstai 12. Kes�kuuta 2003 21:59, H. Narfi Stefansson kirjoitti: > On the topic of the update kernel and the kernel that Danny maintains, > also applies to the modified update kernel from Thomas. > > Would you guys consider giving your kernels different names, just so > that we don't have to ask confused users "Which version of 2.4.21.0.18 > are you using? The security update one, Thomas' one or Danny's?" > > Thomas, at some point you used TmB for your kernel, was there something > you didn't like about that? Danny, could you do something similar? > > Btw. I love your kernel versions, I think you are both doing an > incredible job with the kernel. Thank you both. > I just don't want other users to get confused. > > Best, > > Narfi.
Normally I use _TmB + build number ... The reason my _updated_ update kernel kept the version was to keep it "name compatible" with the original update kernel so that 3rd party modules and RPMS wont complain ( nVidia, Ati, ...) When Juan releases a new Cooker kernel (probably 2.4.21 release based) I'll start posting updates, as I have many things on my todo list, but I won't start backporting them to a pre kernel ... since they need fixes that are in newer rc's... and they will use the 'TmB' ... Ofcourse I can't speak for Danny, but AFAIK his kernels are now at 20mdk going on 21mdk... -- Regards Thomas Backlund http://www.iki.fi/tmb/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
