--- Charles Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 19:36, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Of course we could, but do we want to? The whole > point of this change, > > it seems to me, is to be more elegant, and yanking > out libraries a user > > is relying on and expecting them to reinstall them > manually does not > > strike me as being that. > > Of course. I see your point. It does not seem > readily apparent to > me that there is any elegant solution. >
There is no elegant solution if the plan is to use a tool to do something that it was not designed to do. How about starting from zore, look at the problem and come up with a freshly thought tool? I mentioned something to this effect a while back in: http://us.f137.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=2336_995241_87139_1906_752_0_4765_-1_0&YY=83181&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Inbox __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
