Danny wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: >> > I guess so. I have installed from prosuite CDs and didN't looked at >> it, and it is not bad that the RPM is installed on that machine, >> since it is my 9.1 stable installation. And Buchans solution works >> fine here. >> > >> >> BTW, I forgot to mention, the %__find_requires entry should be in your >> ~/.rpmmacros, not in the spec file (otherwise you will add it to each >> spec file for a package linking to libGL.so.1, instead of once ...). > > Buchan, wouldn't it be possible to fix this problem in the new nvidia > rpms you are making? Just adding this to the global rpmmacros?
If it can be done via a macro, and it can be "stacked" (ie different settings in global macros and user macros and/or in spec files all taken into account), but I don't think I would want to redefine %__find_requires in /etc/rpm/macros (could be confusing ...). Good idea though ... I will have to track down the macro and test it ... Hmm, Warly said it was '_requires_exceptions', but it doesn't seem to work on 9.1, and my cooker box is a bit inaccessible right now, I will try tomorrow on cooker. Regards, Buchan
