-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

G�tz Waschk wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003, 16:27:00 Uhr MET, schrieb Stefan van der Eijk:
>
>>Also, you can't destinguish them... as .so dependencies already existed.
>>If we would have called them ".fish" then you would know --> ".fish" is a
>>-devel dependency.
>
>
> I don't think we need virtual provides at all, as we could resolve the
> dependancy at the build stage of the package to the package name. The
> requires script could check which package provides the required
> library and put that package name in the dependancy list.

But which package name do you use? The real name (in which case you need
to rebuild all packages that require the -devel package when the major
changes) or or one of the virtual provides (ie lib<name>-devel)? In the
latter case, which one? And how does the script decide?

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--------------Another happy Mandrake Club member--------------|
Buchan Milne                Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work            +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering         http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key                   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE++GXLrJK6UGDSBKcRApEAAKCtJ6fMB8BJ7DycMiJYAVgBmdvWNQCggI8I
bIHz6Mkxeiev1OYWHmFRA18=
=R8uR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

******************************************************************
Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our
e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy.
******************************************************************

Reply via email to