Le ven 27/06/2003 � 18:06, Guillaume Cottenceau a �crit :
> Pierre BETOUIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Le ven 27/06/2003 � 16:33, Guillaume Cottenceau a �crit :
> > > Pierre BETOUIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > It seems that postfix (package 9.1) is broken for sasl support.
> > >
> > > so, you talk about 9.1
> > I talk about both 9.1 and cooker : they have the same problem :
> > sasl support doesn't work.
>
> You can't talk about both at the same time. First, because this
> list is not a support channel for 9.1. Second, because packages
> do change, 9.1 an cooker are two different distributions.
OK, have i to explain you how are my boxes ? OK, so :
- For the 9.1. It's my server : i want a clean distro (astonishing?!),
and sure, i won't put a cooker one on it !!
- I'm running cooker (on my other boxes).Did you really believe that i subscribed this ML, and didn't know what was cooker ? funny. I'm posting since more than 2 years ! > > > > I'll try to make a bug report (bugzilla) as soon as possible. > > > > Postfix uses libsasl2-* but plugins are threated with libsasl7-plug*... > > > > > > ah, no, now you talk about cooker? (postfix of 9.1 uses > > > libsasl7). > > The problem in 9.1 is that postfix uses libsasl7 but plugins which are > > seen are only plugins of libsasl2 (libsasl2-plug-md5cram, etc...). > > Are you sure of that? I think other people have successfully used > postfix+sasl in 9.1. Though, I don't know sasl at all :/. Yes, i am. Tested on both !! If i were not, i wouldn't post this ! > > I've done tests with both plugins, and only those from libsasl2 are seen > > (making a 'helo localhost' on port 25 running postfix, by example) > > > > I don't know if it's a postfix problem or a sasl problem, but one thing > > is sure : it's broken. -- Pierre BETOUIN GnuPG key : lynx -dump perso.club-internet.fr/unsignedchr/GnupgKey.asc | gpg --import
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
