Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...] > > Warly and me, actually. FYI I stopped because of the too little > > positive feedback received (that's also what builds up > > motivation), > > Well, before I was active on cooker, it was very much appreciated. Thanks. > Also, members on MandrakeClub I am sure would appreciate it: > > http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Splatt_Forum&file=viewtopic&topic=9311&forum=16 Yes.. > > and too little spontaneous information received from > > other developers on what important things they did in the past > > week. > > What kind of info do you want? Basically I would have liked to not be obliged to go "itching" information. Important packages uploads, important mandrake software milestones, were the info put in MCWN and if responsible for them would have sent me the information (as I had requested) it would have been a far easier and more pleasant job. > > Hum, no, cooker traffic would be a little bit different I think. > > Like Todd did once, or like kernel traffic can be. Sticking to > > talking about important threads of discussion, rather than > > announcing new features and important packages changes. > > I think important package changes might be worth a mention, but also Yes of course - just wanted to underline that it's out of a "traffic" scope, in theory. > summary of some big threads may be worthwhile, and if the news is placed > somewhere comments are posible (like MandrakeClub), then it would be > easy to get feedback from non-cooker users. > > IMHO, if people will contribute, and the person responsible only needs > to collate and spellcheck, it can be done with less work. Doing it via Well talking about important threads need be "written" anyway.. > MandrakeClub may also provide an easy way for translations to be done, > after which they could be mailed out (but someone like Reinout will know > more about that). > > Regards > Buchan -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
