Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed Jul 02 19:54 -0700, Duncan wrote: > > I understand those creating mdk rpm packages can't do this, and that's a fair > > portion of the regulars on this list, but here, I always use --allow-force > > and --noclean. > > Even if I wasn't making mdk rpms, I'd never do this. Having to use > either option indicates a bug (especially when its use is required for > an extended period of time... we've had totally broken perl dependencies > because of rpm-4.2 for at least a month now).
There is a problem in perl-URPM trying to handle epoch promotion of rpm, if someone knowns how does it work, let me know, there are too many code implications and should have missing something as this is what cause everything to be removed in order to upgrade perl (any epoch package have the problem). So new perl-URPM-0.91-8mdk has lost this "functionnalities" and everything is running back again almost correctly, there should be some case where it fails (due to the need to promoting epoch) let me know by sending me a urpmi bug report so that I can check was works or not. Fran�ois.
