m�ndagen den 7 juli 2003 23.07 skrev Michael Scherer:
> On Monday 07 July 2003 22:07, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > m�ndagen den 7 juli 2003 20.30 skrev Michael Scherer:
> > > On Monday 07 July 2003 19:30, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > already packaged :
> > >
> > >
> > > /home/misc $ urpmq -i libnet Name        : libnet Version     :
> > > 1.1.0 Release     : 1mdk Group       : System/Libraries Size
> > >
> > > : 265279 Architecture: i586 Summary     : A C library for portable
> > >
> > > packet creation
> >
> > Yes, but these packages are quite different. I could have named it
> > "libnet-compat", would that have been better?
>
> I think , yes.
> And, libnet should be libnet1.

I think not since libnet v1.0.2a is the last version and is unsupported, 
v1.1.* is a total rewrite and may become v2.x someday (libnet2-2.*.rpm).

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com

Reply via email to