> On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 09:10, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: >> > --=-=-= >> > >> > * Thu Jul 10 2003 Laurent MONTEL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> 0.75-34mdk >> > >> > - Rebuild >> >> Q: is this changelog accurate? If the package is only rebuilt, I would >> expect the release number to upped and a changelog entry to be added. >> From what I see here, some more things have changed and therefore the >> changelog entry is incomplete. Or am I missing something? > > These are rebuilds for the new finds/provides stuff. Just about every > package in the distro will be rebuilt eventually, I believe. Same as > many were when we went up to an incompatible gcc version during the last > cycle, and also for perl 5.8.
I understand this. But if a package is rebuilt, then I expect only the version to be upped and a changelog entry to be added. In this case the BuildRequires were changed, and the changelog mail showed lots of other things, which turned out to be a bug in the upload script?? I'm just requesting that the changelog is filled in accurately. No more, no less. Otherwise we might as well leave it blank, or remove the changelog alltogether (all these files are in CVS anyway, right?). regards, Stefan
