On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 10:35, David Walser wrote: > Levi Ramsey wrote: > > On Thu Jul 10 13:40 +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > >> We don't use soundwrapper for cpu-intensive applications because > >> it has an important cpu overhead. > >> > >> Moreover, FB uses SDL and SDL can use (theoretically) arts. > > > > O if every app would just use ao... ;o) > > I agree, that would be nice. Unfortunately that means they'd all be > crashing right now in some circumstances (aRts has the device open). > Correct?
Yup. The menu is useless if I have to start it from the command line to give it the correct DSL options. Maybe soundwrapper needs to be re-written to include the ability to detect an SDL linked binary, then add the correct SDL sound options instead of running (arts/esd)dsp. I'll look into it. TTFN, Lonnie Borntreger
