On 2003-07-20(Sun) 06:11:22 -0700, Andi Payn wrote: > > | recommendations, and they don't find either guile-gtk. (For example, > > | guile-gtk.h is placed in /usr/include/libguile-gtk-1.2_0/guile-gtk.h, but > > | guile-config doesn't list that directory, so the file is never found.) > > > > Is the /libguile-gtk-1.2_0/ subdir invented by packager? > > I'm not sure. I do know that the only file in that directory is guile-gtk.h, > however.
Götz, is there any reason to intentionally move the guile-gtk.h header in guile-gtk package to subfolder? > No, sorry; nothing to do with guile here. I meant that (just as with guile), > there is no package for the gtk2 port of gtkextra. > > If you have an up-to-date package, please upload it. (If you're concerned that > no package needs it, well, now we have one: gnubg.) Or I can package it, if > you don't want to bother. It's here: http://deaddog.org/Mandrake/cooker/contrib/SRPMS/gtk+extra1.1-1.1.0-0.20030629.1mdk.src.rpm AFAIK the GTK2 port has never been distributed, and only lives in CVS so far. It's in a bad shape too (I have to modify a few places so that it can build). But I really don't know where to upload it (don't want to dump that to /incoming and be ignored). If you want a newer CVS checkout, I can finish it shortly. Abel > > | If you link /usr/include/libguile-gtk-1.2_0/guile-gtk.h into /usr/include, > > | that allows guile to be used in gnubg. Should the package > > | (libguile-gtk-1.2_0-devel) include this link, or is there a better way to > > | accomplish this? > > > > Better patch guile-config to include the aforementioned include dir. > > On the other hand, if we get the gtk2 port of guile-gtk, then the only package > I've seen for which this is a problem will use that instead, so there's > really no need to change anything. > > Thanks. > > -- Abel Cheung Linux counter #256983 | http://counter.li.org GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
