On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Olivier Thauvin wrote: > > What's the problem? Or, are you still telling things without checking? > > Gwenole, I don't understand you sometimes... > You know that the kernel don't build on most arch except x86*.
I was replying to Stefan saying amd64 kernel doesn't build whereas it does. I don't know for others so I won't answer for that. > Second point, you are running cooker ? I am surprised ! Where can we get > these cooker ? You can't for simple reasons: there is no disk left on ken. Warly surely explained that to you but probably don't listen. I won't tell more because that doesn't concern this list and warly has all necessary details of that matter. It's up to him to possibly tell you more. Next, the current Cooker/main for AMD64 is not complete yet and another (cosmetic but non time-negligeable) issue surfaced again. :-/ > You didn't notice this on the wiki. I won't because we have our own internal wiki, engineering meetings summaries, etc. Those are confidential. I won't tell you any release date either, nor do I want to waste time at distilling valueable information from that. > I just make kernel-2.6 for ppc... I will make it sparc, alpha ASAP, but > I will blacklist x86_64 ! No way to check, I won't loose my time. Why don't you simply %ifarch things you know that builds on and that works? i.e. %ifarch %ix86 ppc for now. That's more logical. > If you're working on main, we are interest to build contrib ! That's the plan but not feasible right now. You'd probably be happier some day around August. ;-) > The worst, what can I said to poeple at my job ? They will buy a x86_64 > and asked what is the state of mandrake on this arch... Should I say > "Mandrake sucks, I don't know nothing about it, wait RH release" ? Don't be silly because you know there will be an MDK 9.2 for AMD64. Next, people at your job are not stupid and will check "your" information (in double quotes) and realize that's wrong.
